| Author |
Message |
|
Element
|
Post subject: Spike's Carbine Buffer Tube  Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:31 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:03 pm
Posts: 3
|
|
I'm currently in the process of building my first AR. I decided to go with a Spike's stripped lower, enhanced lower parts kit, and carbine buffer assembly kit. So far, I have been really impressed with everything, with one exception. I was disappointed to see that the buffer tube is gray as opposed to black. I am not real picky, but it is a really noticeable difference. I have heard great reviews for the product so I am sure I will be happy with how it shoots once installed, which is really what counts. Still, I was hoping someone might have a recommendation of a paint/finish etc. that I could apply that would be durable, not flake, and have a matte finish to match the receiver. Thanks for your input.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
hottnucks
|
Post subject: Re: Spike's Carbine Buffer Tube Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 2:16 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:02 pm
Posts: 1
|
|
The gray color is from the dry film lube that is on the exterior of the tube. It is mil-spec and there for a reason. I would recommend not painting over the gray coating. Spike's buffer assemblies are some of the finest mil-spec receiver extensions made. Buy one, install it, and shoot it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Element
|
Post subject: Re: Spike's Carbine Buffer Tube Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 10:04 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:03 pm
Posts: 3
|
|
Ok excellent thank you for the reply. I didn't realize that it was supposed to be like that. Still learning the AR ropes. I will certainly leave it as is. I appreciate the help.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
loganp0916
|
Post subject: Spike's Carbine Buffer Tube Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 10:12 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:15 pm
Posts: 235
Location: Florida
|
|
Shame on you for doubting Spike's Tactical. Lol
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Element
|
Post subject: Re: Spike's Carbine Buffer Tube Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 11:37 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:03 pm
Posts: 3
|
|
Lesson learned. Thanks again.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
