Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ

Board index » Spike's Tactical Forums » Spike's Products




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Billet Biohazard Lower Reciever VS Punisher Lower Reciever
 Post Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 1:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 4
Is the Billet Lower Reciever really worth it? I'm looking to buy either the Billet Biohazrd Lower w/ Ehanced Kit- M4 ($570.00) or the Punisher Lower w/ Enhanced Kit- M4 ($355.00) My question is to all the people who have had both Billet and non-billet recievers...Is the extra $215 really worth it?? What are the pros and cons?? Thanks ahead of time! Much appreciated!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Billet Biohazard Lower Reciever VS Punisher Lower Reciev
 Post Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 8:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:52 pm
Posts: 13
I am still building mine, and I have only experience with other peoples ar's but I thought I would comment anyway.

I got the billet specifically because I am shooting left handed and it has the ambi bolt release. So I am defiantly sold on it. Its other features like captured pins are not something that matter much to me but its a great idea and I wouldn't be surprised if other people try and copy it. The adjustable upper/lower tension and adjustable trigger reset(if that's what its called) seem cool to me because I like to tune stuff and i am very picky about fit even though the tension is not a big deal or a big affect on accuracy if any.

Basically I wanted the best and I do believe I got it. I would still be totally happy with the standard lower.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Billet Biohazard Lower Reciever VS Punisher Lower Reciev
 Post Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:46 pm
Posts: 21
Location: Tucson, AZ
I just got the billet lower for my carbine and I love it. I also have a bushmaster with a regular lower. I would spring for the billet, it really is worth the money.

_________________
"There is nothing in the middle of the road, except white lines and dead armadillos"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Billet Biohazard Lower Reciever VS Punisher Lower Reciev
 Post Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 9:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 4
Thanks guys, I've recently been reading that the billet lower is more useful, as far as accuracy is concerned, on a long distance AR with bull barrels...I still might prefer the lighter metal and the sexy look of the billet, even though i don't plan on building a long distance AR.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Billet Biohazard Lower Reciever VS Punisher Lower Reciev
 Post Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 9:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:20 pm
Posts: 145
Location: Orlando, FL
How about the weight? I am considering the exact same thing but really want to gun to be as light as possible. I am left handed but don't really care about all technical stuff mentioned.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Billet Biohazard Lower Reciever VS Punisher Lower Reciev
 Post Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 11:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 4
skullbox wrote:
How about the weight? I am considering the exact same thing but really want to gun to be as light as possible. I am left handed but don't really care about all technical stuff mentioned.

Yea dude, the billet is slightly lighter than the standard receivers. I believe the metal used is 1075 Alluminum grade 3 something like that...hope that helps.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

Board index » Spike's Tactical Forums » Spike's Products


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright © 2010 Spikes Tactical. Site by NLD Group LLC

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional